Yeah this is correctotcpharm said:The GTP got a 3.9L with less power because it's still a "budget" engine, with fewer "bells and whistles" than are hidden inside the 3.6L.
Similar to the base Cadillac CTS that puts down 210HP with only 2.8L.
The problem with that approach is that it would have significantly delayed introduction of the G6.Mikeybc said:Gm should keep their budget engine in budget cars, the sticker on a loaded up G6 GT is well over $32,000 CDN. and a hot motor like the 3600 should have been an option in the GT trim.
The original SEMA concept for the G6 was supercharged. Too bad that never made it to production.PontiacGA99 said:well i went to look at some g6 yesterday and i was talking to the sales person about why the gtp were not supercharged and he said there is a rumor that they are going to put a supercharger on the g6 maybe it is the 3.6 that is getting it.
I can tell you from a very reliable source, that the G6 GXP project is in limbo at this point. The last news was that, an unspecified V6 exceeding 275 hp was being tested in the vehicle.hook2233 said:I know the 3.9 is in the gtp but i heard a 3.6 275 hp engine is in the future--anyone know about this and when